Snow Blade Attachment on a 1973 Raider 12

More
17 Mar 2015 17:24 #1221 by FewMoreMiles
Thanks GT14...Geno said he had that 4-5" lift link for me regardless. Would rather have that with the cotter pins I think. I was in a real time crunch the day I picked up the Raider 12, and never thought to ask about what wasn't attached to the plow. Thanks for the input :)

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
17 Mar 2015 19:10 #1230 by Scott

FewMoreMiles wrote: Hi Geno...no worries. Thinking about running over to your Tractor Supply this afternoon to be quite honest. I have visited two local locations, as well as several farm supply type stores, and can't find the seat I want. I found low backs, and I found huge seats but nothing in between. I found this in my snow plow manual last evening...is this the lift link bar you are referring to? Thanks for the follow up! Hope you were able to enjoy the weather yesterday :thumb1


Thats the one every one misplaces. Its easy to forget it. I had one and it is around someware, but i just use a few chain links. And it works fine. We are glade you got it figured out and we are always happy to help you out. :horse

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Geno
  • Online
  • Administrator Supporter
  • Administrator Supporter
    Super Users
  • Wheel Horse Stables Owner
More
17 Mar 2015 19:52 - 17 Mar 2015 19:54 #1233 by Geno
That's the one Jeff. :yes Sorry I'm behind on this one, yesterday was a wild car work day and it bled into today and will be tomorrow also. :doh


The guys here seem to have everything covered though, they're the best around. :thumb1

Welcome to the Stables!
Last edit: 17 Mar 2015 19:54 by Geno.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
18 Mar 2015 10:19 #1287 by FewMoreMiles
Agreed Geno...response was immediate, and I'm thankful for each of you and the help you've offered. Still just waiting for the blast cabinet to arrive, and hoping it does so before I get crazy busy with work.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
18 Mar 2015 10:27 #1288 by JustinW.73

Geno wrote: The guys here seem to have everything covered though, they're the best around. :thumb1


You can say that again:

1973 No Name 16
1966 856
1964 854
198? 520H
Way too many decks
1966 f100

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.269 seconds