What will you be using for spring?

More
25 Mar 2015 14:17 #1926 by GT 14

Kurt-NEPA wrote: GT. Engine RPM at PTO speed (540 rpm) is about 1800. That is about peak torque for an 8N. Funny thing is that the engine is only about 24HP. Not much more than a 520H, but the torque must be at least double. That belly mower is easy duty for an 8N in normal grass.


Thats about half the speed on the 520 and like you say 2x torque.

1969 GT-18
1978 C-101
1983 C-225

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Mar 2015 17:06 #1929 by M Bailey

Kurt-NEPA wrote: Thanks guys, That 8N belly mower is a bit rare, but they are out there. It took me two years to find it and it was 300 miles away. Well worth the trip. Woods made 5ft and 6ft belly mowers with mounting kits for various tractors. The 5 foot is more common, mine is a 6 foot. Mowing with it is just like a larger Wheel Horse. Its amazing how much faster it is mowing with a 6ft mower. It cut my time in half. The only down side is that it is not as maneuverable. Strange thing - I burn less gas with the 8N than with my 520H and the 8N is quieter. I love the sound of old Ford flat heads.

Here is another view


The first motorized vehicle I ever drove was a Ford-Ferguson around 1960. I was tasked with mucking out the barn into the manure spreader and then spreading said load onto the field. It turned out to be about 2 hours of shoveling manure for 5 minutes of spreading. I wouldn't trade those memories for anything. I'll always have a soft spot in my heart for those old Fords.

Major


"I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member." Groucho Marx

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Mar 2015 17:58 #1933 by JustinW.73

GT 14 wrote:

Kurt-NEPA wrote: GT. Engine RPM at PTO speed (540 rpm) is about 1800. That is about peak torque for an 8N. Funny thing is that the engine is only about 24HP. Not much more than a 520H, but the torque must be at least double. That belly mower is easy duty for an 8N in normal grass.


Thats about half the speed on the 520 and like you say 2x torque.


But it is a 4 cylinder isn't it? You also have to remember, speed is not torque. Speed is distance*time, torque is the force (rotational force) being applied. And torque is really foot lbs.

1973 No Name 16
1966 856
1964 854
198? 520H
Way too many decks
1966 f100

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Mar 2015 18:15 #1940 by GT 14
And the torque is what dos the work, so you can run lower RPM and save fuel.

1969 GT-18
1978 C-101
1983 C-225

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Mar 2015 18:38 #1944 by Kurt-NEPA

M Bailey wrote: I wouldn't trade those memories for anything. I'll always have a soft spot in my heart for those old Fords.


As you can tell, I have a soft spot in my heart for them too. I drove my first one as an early teen back in the 60's I was in my glory. When I retired and bought a place with 4 acres of grass I needed more than my aging Craftsman GT could handle. A new Kubota or fancy zero turn was out my price range, that's when I remembered the 8N I drove in my youth. Strange thing is that old tractor I drove back then was probably almost 20 years old. Many of these old Ford are still working today. Ford built the first one in 1939. Talk about old technology. Mine is a 1950, almost the last of the breed. What I like is that it was designed to be maintained and rebuilt by shade tree mechanics. What happened to that approach?

1988 520H
1995 520H
1998 520xi
2000 522xi
1950 Ford 8N
1955 Ford 660
Single Stage Blower
2-Two Stage Blowers

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Mar 2015 18:39 #1945 by Kurt-NEPA
Yep Justin, A 4 cylinder flat head it was. All N tractors from 1939-1952 had them

1988 520H
1995 520H
1998 520xi
2000 522xi
1950 Ford 8N
1955 Ford 660
Single Stage Blower
2-Two Stage Blowers

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Mar 2015 18:46 #1948 by M Bailey
Those old Fords were a small bore/long stroke engine, not much on horse power but long on torque. Very economical tractors to operate. Check the oil daily and the gas once a week tractors.

Major


"I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member." Groucho Marx

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Mar 2015 19:02 #1953 by JustinW.73

M Bailey wrote: Those old Fords were a small bore/long stroke engine, not much on horse power but long on torque. Very economical tractors to operate. Check the oil daily and the gas once a week tractors.


Pretty much the opposite of a jd 2 cyl. Huge bore, but the strokes weren't that long though were they?

1973 No Name 16
1966 856
1964 854
198? 520H
Way too many decks
1966 f100

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Mar 2015 19:53 - 25 Mar 2015 19:54 #1973 by M Bailey

JustinW.73 wrote:

M Bailey wrote: Those old Fords were a small bore/long stroke engine, not much on horse power but long on torque. Very economical tractors to operate. Check the oil daily and the gas once a week tractors.


Pretty much the opposite of a jd 2 cyl. Huge bore, but the strokes weren't that long though were they?


Modern engines are mostly but not all "over square" meaning that the bore is larger than the stroke. "Square" that meaning the bore and stroke are equal, and "under square" meaning the bore is smaller than the stroke.
For my springtime chores the 416-8 gets garden duty with the plow and disc.





While the C-101 gets mowing duty!


Major


"I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member." Groucho Marx
Attachments:
Last edit: 25 Mar 2015 19:54 by M Bailey.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
25 Mar 2015 20:42 #1978 by Kurt-NEPA
Nice tractor, I like the plow and disc. All ready for the summer garden!

1988 520H
1995 520H
1998 520xi
2000 522xi
1950 Ford 8N
1955 Ford 660
Single Stage Blower
2-Two Stage Blowers

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.443 seconds